Who JailBee is for.

Four projects come up whenever this one does. They are all good, and they sort into two families answering two different questions: how do I get the right toolchain, per branch? and how do I stop the agent from wrecking my laptop? JailBee answers both at once, which is exactly why it is heavier than either.

The short answer.

Pick Dev Containers if a shared toolchain is what you need, or if anyone on the team is on macOS or Windows. It is the standard, and JailBee has nothing to add.

Pick Docker Sandboxes if you need a hypervisor between the agent and your laptop. Its microVM is a genuinely stronger boundary than JailBee's.

Pick JailBee when the runtime is the hard part: a stack that boots, listens, renders and occasionally wants /dev/kvm — several of them at once, with an agent working behind the fence.

What each one lets you do.

Note the two rows where JailBee is the one that can't. They are the trade, not an oversight.

Dev Containers BranchBox nono Docker Sandboxes JailBee
What it is a toolchain in a container a worktree + Compose per feature a fence around one process a microVM per agent run a Linux machine per branch
Boundary host Docker daemon host Docker daemon Landlock + seccomp hypervisor, own kernel Incus container, shared kernel
Run the repo's docker-compose.yml without touching the host's Docker daemon partial — privileged docker-in-docker no no yes yes
Two branches both listening on :3000 partial — each forwarded to a different host port partial — a port range per feature no yes yes
A browser and an IDE inside the boundary, on your own screen partial — community noVNC only no not applicable — they run on the host no yes
Restrict what the code inside can reach no no yes — per tool, HTTP yes — HTTP(S) only, rest dropped yes — host:port, any protocol
Keep an agent out of your real checkout partial — opt-in clone into a volume no partial — per-path grants partial — --clone yes — always its own clone
Snapshot before an agent runs, roll back after no — rebuild no not applicable no — recreate yes
Hold up when the kernel is what breaks no no no yes — own kernel per sandbox no — shared kernel
Work on macOS or Windows yes partial — macOS yes yes no — Linux only
Licence open spec (MIT) MIT Apache-2.0 free CLI, sign-in required GPL-3.0-or-later

yes · yes, with the caveat named · no · the question doesn't apply. Scroll sideways for the full grid.

Isolation by boundary, not by allowlist.

Most sandboxes work by enumeration. You declare which paths, which hosts, which syscalls, which tools — and everything the workload does has to fit through that list. It is precise, and it works beautifully when you know in advance what the workload will do.

Agentic development is the case where you don't. The agent decides it needs docker compose up. Then an emulator. Then a headless browser, then a real one. Then a package manager you have never installed. With an allowlist, every one of those is a policy change, and each one widens the policy for everything else — so the isolation degrades exactly as the work gets interesting.

JailBee moves the boundary instead of enumerating through it. The container is the boundary; what happens inside is your business. Adding a tool costs nothing, because nothing was enumerated in the first place.

The four, briefly.

When not to use JailBee.

Read the full technical comparison — every row of the grid above with its caveats, how the repo's config spends the genericity, and the sources each claim was checked against.